News Round Up

It’s been awhile since I’ve done one of these, but I’m taking advantage of a day off to catch up on the news. Enjoy!

Lower back tattoos interfere with epidurals? Doctors say no.

Story of a water birth in West Texas, and another article about water birth.

Midwife assisted births on the rise.

The Today Show online investigates alternative pain mediation techniques.

80% of people in the UK oppose a bill which would remove the legal requirement that a doctor consider the child’s need for a father when performing IVF procedures.

More love for midwives in Wisconsin.

Opinion piece about the financial waste caused by intervention and over-hospitalization of birthing women.

43% of women in California breastfeed exclusively.

One hospital in Houston considers outlawing VBACs (vaginal births after cesarean sections) completely.

Study says that curvy women live longer and have smarter children.

NYTimes article discusses the declining enrollments in childbirth classes.

Transgender Day of Remembrance

Tomorrow is the Transgender Day of Remembrance. Julia Serano, a writer and activist whose work I really love wrote a great short piece for Feministing about the day. Check it out.

Good News Update: A Call for Radical Doulas

About two months ago, I posted a call for radical doulas, because a woman had emailed me who was having trouble finding a doula to attend her birth. A refresher of her situation: 

Last week I received an email from a woman living in a small town outside of Minneapolis, MN who has had a terrible time trying to find a doula. She is now 17 weeks pregnant, and she told me how she has been turned down, not once, not twice, but THREE times by three different doulas. Why?

–The first doula turned her down because she is not sure if she wants to give birth without an epidural.

–The second doula turned her down because she was pregnant with twins, and decided to do a selective reduction and terminate one of the pregnancies at 11 weeks.

–The third doula turned her down because she is serving as a surrogate for a gay couple.

Well I have good news! She found a doula. While the doula she eventually found was in her own doctor’s office (a former doula and midwife), I want to say thank you to everyone who emailed me, forwarded the message along and offered their support and assistance for her doula search. I got more than 12 offers from women to be her doula, in addition to offers to screen doulas for her, and much more. It was really amazing to see what kind of mobilizing you were all willing to do. Thank you!

Lastly, I just want to share with you her words:

I’m so relieved and happy to have found someone that I know will be great to work with. I really, really appreciate your help in this situation too. Just having your support reassured me that I was doing the right thing in trying to find a doula. The search was a little difficult but it helped me so much to know that there are really awesome women (like yourself) out there who would be willing to help if they could.

Thank you again and if it’s ok with you I would like to update you once the baby is born. I’m looking forward to a successful doula attended birth!

So thanks again to all of you for your support and solidarity.

Article about lesbian motherhood and HIV/AIDs

This is a really touching and well-written piece about one woman’s journey to motherhood during the HIV/AIDs epidemic. HIV really changed the landscape of gay and lesbian family creation forever, since it made casual donor relationships almost impossible because of the fear of passing on the HIV infection.

Kick-Ass Radical Doulas: The Prison Doula Project Turns 5

ba_invite_back.jpg

The first group that I highlighted back when I started the blog, the The Birth Attendents: Prison Doula Project, is turning five this year. If you’re in Olympia, Washington definitely go to the party and meet the awesome women. But if not, you can buy a ticket as an out of town supporter. I highly recommend it! They are an awesome group of doulas.

You can find more information about the event on their website. Happy Birthday Prison Doula Project! Keep up the amazing work.

Resources for lesbians who want to become parents

I recently spoke at the NYU LGBT Center, as part of a Queer Lunch series they have (called Quench). I was talking about the connections between reproductive rights and LGBT liberation. It’s a topic I enjoy discussing (you can check out an article I wrote about it). But after the talk, one woman came up to me and asked about resources for lesbians who want to start families. I realized that I had little to tell her, except to point her toward the parenting section of the LGBT library the center had created. So I went home and did a little more internet research, and here is some of what I came up with. Please, if you have more resources, post them in the comments.

Continue reading

From NYTimes: Artificially breaking water does not speed up labor

The practice of artificially rupturing a woman’s membrane, or bag of waters, during labor has become quite common. I have seen it myself a few times, and have heard about it A LOT. Well, now there is research proving that it has no affect on shortening the length of labor or improving the health of the baby.

From the report:

Evidence does not support the routine breaking the waters for women in spontaneous labour
The aim of breaking the waters (also known as artificial rupture of the membranes, ARM, or amniotomy), is to speed up and strengthen contractions, and thus shorten the length of labour. The membranes are punctured with a crochet-like long-handled hook during a vaginal examination, and the amniotic fluid floods out. Rupturing the membranes is thought to release chemicals and hormones that stimulate contractions. Amniotomy has been standard practice in recent years in many countries around the world. In some centres it is advocated and performed routinely in all women, and in many centres it is used for women whose labours have become prolonged. However, there is little evidence that a shorter labour has benefits for the mother or the baby. There are a number of potential important but rare risks associated with amniotomy, including problems with the umbilical cord or the baby’s heart rate.

The question is whether or not the research recommendations will get implemented in practice. The trickle-down effect is slow–research comes out, and has to slowly trickle down the medical system to providers. Medical students are probably the most likely to hear these things first, as they are studying the practices, although medical textbooks don’t always have the most up-to-date research. This just reinforces the idea that doctors are routinely performing procedures that have no benefit to the laboring woman.

Thanks to Doulicia for the link.

The elective cesarean debate continues

Cara over at Curvature has a good post about an article which blames women’s vanity for the rate of elective cesareans. It’s an article from an Australian newspaper, but Cara brings up some good points, particularly that the idea that tons of women are running out and planning c-sections is false. While a small number of women are choosing (independently of their doctors recommendations) to plan c-sections, the majority of them are being encouraged to have c-sections (planned or unplanned) by their doctors. The jump in US c-section rates (almost 30% now) is not due to women’s choices, but to doctors decisions.

Check out Cara for more.

What to eat when you’re eating for two

Some new research and tools from the Department of Agriculture just came out for pregnant women, to help them gauge what they should be eating, and what kind of weight gain they should shoot for. You can see the tool here, which asks for information like age, height, weight and due date to calculate what the caloric breakdown should be.

Pregnancy nutrition is not a new topic–doctors have been telling women how to eat, and particularly what not to eat during pregnancy for a really long time. The famous What to Expect When You’re Expecting book even has a counterpart, What to Eat When You’re Expecting.

What strikes me about a lot of this information is how much it focuses on what NOT to eat. Pregnant women have endless lists of forbidden foods. One site I found had a long list of things on its forbidden list:

  • Sushi, raw fish, undercooked foods, Swordfish, shark, king mackerel, tilefish, and fresh (as well as canned albacore) tuna; raw sushi and raw shellfish; refrigerated smoked seafood such as lox, trout, and whitefish (unless cooked as an ingredient in another dish).
  • Raw milk and any dairy product (cheese, yogurt) made with raw milk; soft cheeses such as Brie, Camembert, feta, Danish blue, Roquefort, and Mexican-style queso blanco and queso fresco (unless clearly marked as pasteurized); uncooked foods made with raw eggs (such as salad dressings and protein shakes).
  • Teas made with goldenseal, black or blue cohosh, ephedra, dong quai, feverfew, juniper, pennyroyal, Saint-John’s-wort, rosemary, or thuja. Drinking lots of nutritionally void diet drinks instead of healthier ones like water or juice.
  • Then of course there is NO alcohol, nicotine or caffeine.

Many women even have to go off important medications that they take for their own well being. It’s a complicated issue, and pregnant women obviously have to take into account the well being of the fetus they are carrying. But how much is too much? Are we overreacting about the effect that small amounts of these foods can really have on pregnant women and their fetuses?

I have read some interesting things about alcohol and pregnancy, and how the research is really not conclusive that small amounts of alcohol during pregnancy actually have negative effects. Most of what we know comes from alcoholic pregnant women and the effects on their children. Part of the problem is that we can’t do good research on pregnant women–there are all sorts of rules governing the ethics of medical trials on pregnant women (maybe for some good reasons).

But it means that we don’t really know for sure what kind of impact certain foods, drugs and treatments have on women and their children. So doctors instead try to make recommendations based on anecdotal cases, what the research we do have says, and their best guess. The same thing goes for a lot of medicines and interventions used during childbirth. It’s kind of scary when you think about it.

My piece about abortion doulas

Just wanted to share the link to a piece I just wrote for RH Reality Check about abortion doulas, particularly the Birth Sisters at Boston Medical Center and their attempts to expand their doula services to women having abortions. It’s called Mi Compañera.