Playing the c-section guessing game

A new British study is out that correlates cervix length with likelihood of cesarean section.

Researchers in Britain say their study of more than 27,000 pregnancies found that women with the longest cervixes were more likely to need surgery to deliver their child.

Probably not a surprise, but I’m not a big fan of research like this. Number one, I don’t understand why having a long cervix might mean you couldn’t deliver vaginally. Number two, we need LESS c-sections, not more. In the US we already have a c-section rate surpassing 1 in 3, and the World Health Organization recommends 1 in 10. Number 3, is this kind of research going to give doctors another reason not to even allow women to try and deliver vaginally? I can just see it, sorry ma’am, your cervix is too long, we should just schedule a c-section because you’re probably going to need it anyway. What happened to correlation is not causation?

Lastly, read this piece from Bitch Magazine for more on way scientific studies are not always great science, or great journalism.

via Doulicia

Kick-Ass Radical Doula: Penny Simkin

Penny Simkin, doula, childbirth educator and big deal birth activist, is getting some much deserved press in the Seattle Times, for all the amazing work she has done for change in childbirth.

Known as the mother of the doula movement, Simkin has trained thousands of these caregivers to provide physical and emotional support for women during birth — the only intervention scientifically shown to decrease time in labor (by 25 percent) as well as to reduce Cesarean-section rates by a third.

“Birth never changes,” Simkin says. “But the way we manage it and the way we think of it has. Right now, we’re in a culture of fear around birth.”

Read the piece to learn more about Penny and her impressive career.

She was a born teacher, delved into research, spoke at conferences, and attended many students’ births as a doula before the role had that name. She invented a “birth bar” and birth sling to help women squat and lean during labor; codified birth plans to give women more control over the process; co-authored several books; edited a journal of current scientific literature about birth; pioneered pregnancy-care techniques and counseling for survivors of sexual abuse.

PS. She even went to my alma mater!

At Your Cervix: NYC

I’ve posted about this great film-in-progress before, but if you happen to be in NYC on March 21st you should check out this great event and fundraiser.

Bellydancing, Cocktails and a Film About Cervixes
www.atyourcervixmovie.com
Friday, March 21, 2008
Doors 6:30, Show/Screening 7 pm
Collective Unconscious

279 Church Street, New York City

Hello folks! It’s almost spring and we’re throwing a party in honor of that film we keep telling you about. Hope you’ll come and see some clips, have a drink, give what you can and enjoy a great night of performances and celebration. We’re not finished, but this event will help us get there!

In the name of improving pelvic exams for all patients, hope to see you!

For more information about this important film check out our website for info, trailer, our mailing list, and ways to donate.

Amy Jo
www.atyourcervixmovie.com

Upcoming Doula training in Atlanta

Information about upcoming doula training:

SisterSong is pleased to partner with the International Center for Traditional Childbearing (ICTC) to provide a Full Circle Birth Companion/Doula Training. The training will be held at the Mother House, SisterSong’s national office in Atlanta, Georgia on April 24 – 27, 2008.

ICTC’s Full Circle Birth Companion/Doula Intensive will train you in cultural awareness and sensitivity, infant mortality prevention, high risk pregnancies, medical terminology, inter-uterine growth retardation, nutrition, comprehension, prenatal support, labor management, massage therapy, HIPPA and much more:

Do You Want to Be A Full Circle Birth Companion or Doula? Would You Like to Meet Outstanding Midwives? REGISTER NOW!  Application form is available online at http://www.blackmidwives.org. Training fee is $375 for ICTC or SisterSong members and $425 for non members.  For more information about the training, please contact Shafia Monroe, Trainer at 503.460.9324, email sistahmidwife@msn.com.

Scholarships will be available. All are Welcomed.

Thursday Evening is an Orientation and Welcome Reception; Friday, Saturday and Sunday are training days.

Fire displaces hundreds in Mt. Pleasant

While this is not particularly birth related, it definitely falls into the social justice arena when so many people are affected. Read more about the fire on my post at Feministing and donate some money if you are able.

Update on NYTimes doula piece: Letters

The Sunday NY Times article on doulas created a large response from the doula and birth community. You can see the letters to the editor that were published in response. Not surprising that there were no “right on! my doula sucked too!” letters.

I even saw a comment on a listserve from someone who knows the doula mentioned in the first portion of the piece, the one who supposedly walked out on her client. According to this person she left because of hospital policy (no one allowed in the room when the epidural is being administered) and came back afterwards. It’s all very secondhand, but would not be surprising.

A birth story to brighten up your friday

Some of you may remember a while back when I posted a call for radical doulas. A woman (who I will call J) had reached out to me because she was having real difficulty finding a doula for three reasons: 1) She was serving as a surrogate for a gay male couple 2) She had had a “selective reduction” of the resulting twin pregnancies to just have one child 3) She wasn’t sure if she would forgo an epidural.

This is quite amazing timing considering the doula article from Sunday’s NYTimes. It shows that yes, there are some doulas out there who allow their personal beliefs about lifestyle as well as birth choices to direct who they work with. But the overwhelming response to my call for radical doulas also shows that there are just as many (if not more) doulas who are willing to support all sorts of women with all sorts of birth preferences.

J was awesome enough to share her birth story with me and you all will be happy to know that she eventually found a great doula who supported her through her birth. Her story made me tear up, and reminded me why I do this work (and why I bother fighting anti-doula ignorance in the blog world too).

Happy Friday everyone.

From J’s email:
Hello!
I don’t know if you remember me but a while back I wrote to you to ask for help in finding a doula for when I gave birth to my surrogate child. After I found a doula I told you I would update you after I gave birth.
Well, my surro-child is here! He was born on Feb 12, two weeks before his due date. My doctor felt that it would be best to induce labor since my blood pressure had been creeping up slowly over last month of my pregnancy. He wanted to err on the side of caution and I was ok with that because I knew the baby’s dads were starting to get nervous.
Thank goodness for my doula! I was started on pitocin around 8 AM and she got there at 10 AM just as I was starting to feel contractions. For the next 8 hours she would only leave my side once and that was just to go to the bathroom. She helped me through every single point of what ended up being a hard, painful and occasionaly scary labor. At one point in my labor the baby’s heartbeat started to drop and my doula was the one who got me to move into different positions just in case the baby’s cord was getting pinched. Turns out she was right! After I moved around a few times the baby’s heartbeat was just fine. I wonder what would have happened if she had not been there to suggest something as simple as changing positions!
At another point my doula rubbed my back for two hours straight. She always seemed to know just where I needed to be touched. If I was tensing up in my back or shoulders she would gently rub them to remind me to relax my body. She also seemed to know when not to touch me. If I was tensing up my face she would remind me to feel the contraction in my belly, not in my face. Sounds like a no-brainer, I know, but just having her say those things helped me make it through.
The rest of the birth story after the jump

Continue reading

Bad press for doulas from the NY Times

Sunday’s article in the NY Times Fashion & Style section (again, why do women’s issues always get shelved in this section?!?) presents some bad press for doulas. The title, “And the Doula Makes Four” already implies the three’s a crowd mentality that doesn’t bode well if we think about the hospital delivery room.

The piece goes on to share the story of one mother who was less than pleased with her doula:

Then labor began — and went on and on — and Ms. Myers’s opinion took a nose dive. Though the doctor recommended that Ms. Myers receive intravenous fluids to hydrate her, the doula, eager to avoid medical intervention, insisted that Ms. Myers ignore the suggestion, causing her contractions to spike. When she ultimately chose an epidural, her doula walked out. “She was so set on my having a natural birth, she offended me, she offended the nursing staff, she offended my O.B.,” Ms. Myers said.

These types of stories are disappointing to see, especially in the mainstream media. Doulas get so little press (how many people have never even heard of one?) but of course stories like these are what makes the news. As I’ve talked about a lot on this blog, I don’t support doulas who do not support women’s choices. In my opinion, a doula who pushes a woman to do something she is not comfortable with is not doing a good job supporting that woman. There is a fine line between pushing someone and giving them options or encouraging them to try different things.

That said, I also think there may be some important facts missing from this piece. There is much more to be said here, and this article really does present a one-sided view of the issue. Things that the piece missed:

 1) The perspective of the doula. In many of these cases with doulas in the hospital setting, the doula is put into a really difficult position for a number of reasons. First, medical staff (nurses and doctors) can be really hostile at times, even when the birthing mother advocates for the presence of the doula. The staff can feel threatened by the doulas presence, treat her with disrespect and make their disapproval of her presence clear to everyone involved. Also many of the techniques that a doula encourages are outside the scope of OB practice–things like massage, acupressure and visualization can be things that doctors and nurses don’t believe in, creating more animosity.

2) Most doulas work from the preferences and desires of the birthing mother. The parents may design a birth plan or at least outline the kind of techniques and strategies they want to try during their birth ahead of time. It is these preferences which guide most doula’s practice. Often things happen during a birth that change these preferences, but also frequently the hospital staff and their influence on the mother can change these as well. It is a very difficult balance to strike.

3) Being a doula in the hospital is hard. I say this one from experience. The hospital environment is far from welcoming, and when you have opinions and philosophies (as well as experiences) about what birth should look like, it’s really difficult to stand by and watch that be violated. As a doula you have practically zero control over what is done and what happens in that delivery room, and many times you are the only party involved who is specifically focused on the emotional needs of the birthing mother.  

4) Not every doula is right for every woman. Just like not every doctor is right for every woman, not every doula is a good fit for every woman. It is best when the doula and birthing mother realize that ahead of time so a better match can be found. Things like philosophy about birth and medical intervention are important to discuss ahead of time.

I think the bottom line in all of this is that the increase in doula presence at births is ultimately being driven by the women giving birth. Modern OB practice is going to have to adjust to accomodate the needs of birthing women, who are not going to stand idly by and accept a 1 in 3 c-section rate.

Work for an awesome org–National Advocates for Pregnant Women

I’ve talked about the National Advocates for Pregnant Women quite a bit, as their conference was a big part of the synergy that led me to create this blog. Well they are hiring folks! So if you want the opportunity to work for a great organization that does legal advocacy on behalf of pregnant women–check out the listings.

Good news for Missouri Midwives!

News from Missouri Midwives Supporters
CONTACT:  Mary Ueland (417) 543-4258, better_birth@yahoo.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  Wednesday, February 20, 2008
 
Midwives Licensure Bill Passes Missouri Senate Committee
Comprehensive bill will decriminalize practice of midwifery, and license and regulate midwives
 
(Jefferson City, Mo.) – Midwives advocates across Missouri and the nation today celebrated the passage of Senator John Loudon’s (R, Chesterfield) midwifery licensure bill, SB 1021, from the Missouri Senate Committee on Pensions, General Laws and Veteran’s Affairs.  The long-anticipated legislation would decriminalize the practice of midwifery in Missouri and establish a board to license and regulate Certified Professional Midwives (CPMs).

The committee voted 5-1 before a hearing room packed with citizens from across the state, many of whom represented families who wish to choose a legal midwife to assist them during childbirth.  Committee members combined the bill with SB870, a repeal of the midwifery provision in current statute.  The resulting committee substitute is a comprehensive piece of midwifery legislation.  

“Missouri needs legal midwives,” said Debbie Smithey, President of Missouri Midwives Association.  “This bill will license and regulate the midwives whose legal status is currently in question before the Supreme Court.”
Currently, Certified Nurse-Midwives, who work predominantly in hospital settings, are licensed and regulated in all 50 states, while Certified Professional Midwives, who work in out-of-hospital settings, are licensed and regulated in 24 states, with legislation pending in an additional 20 states, Missouri among them. 

CPMs’ training as specialists in out-of-hospital maternity care qualifies them as essential providers during disasters in which hospitals become inaccessible or unsafe for laboring mothers and newborn babies. In addition, this bill will ensure that all babies born outside of the hospital undergo state-mandated newborn screenings and are provided with legal and secure birth certificates.

“We applaud the committee for their clear show of support for health care freedom in childbirth,” said Laurel Smith, President of Friends of Missouri Midwives, a statewide network of thousands of Missouri homebirth families,  “The parents of our state have been deprived of the freedom to choose a legal midwife specifically trained in out-of-hospital maternity care for too long.  We look forward to seeing this issue debated in the full Senate and anticipate the day when professional midwives are legally recognized and able to serve women freely.”

Missouri is part of The Big Push for Midwives Campaign
Media inquiries should be directed to Mary Ueland at (417) 543-4258, better_birth@yahoo.com.
#####
For more info:
Friends of Missouri Midwives
Missouri Midwives Association
Show-Me Freedom in Healthcare
Free the Midwives
The Big Push for Midwives Campaign

Thanks to Steff for the info.