<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some thoughts on tokenism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: annajcook</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-9960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[annajcook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-9960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a white, cisgendered queer woman I&#039;m not from a demographic that&#039;s generally considered vulnerable to tokenism in feminist spaces. So perhaps I have the privilege of not seeing tokenism in action every day. I recognize that. But I also speak from the position of someone who -- like many of the commenters on this thread and SharkFu&#039;s thread -- discovered the myriad, less-high-profile bloggers in the feminist blogosphere THROUGH the entry-point of higher-profile blogs like Feministing and Feministe. The self-promotion threads as well as regular blog posts and community posts, etc. 


This isn&#039;t to say I don&#039;t see mainstream-vs-margins tension within the virtual space(s) of the internet ... but it&#039;s a very complex dynamic. Like you, Miriam, I&#039;m inclined to see arguments that your presence at Feministing = tokenism as reductive and ultimately judgmental of your participation in a space you&#039;ve chosen without stopping to listen to how you experience that participation, and what it means to you in terms of your blogging, your activism, your identity, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a white, cisgendered queer woman I&#8217;m not from a demographic that&#8217;s generally considered vulnerable to tokenism in feminist spaces. So perhaps I have the privilege of not seeing tokenism in action every day. I recognize that. But I also speak from the position of someone who &#8212; like many of the commenters on this thread and SharkFu&#8217;s thread &#8212; discovered the myriad, less-high-profile bloggers in the feminist blogosphere THROUGH the entry-point of higher-profile blogs like Feministing and Feministe. The self-promotion threads as well as regular blog posts and community posts, etc. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t to say I don&#8217;t see mainstream-vs-margins tension within the virtual space(s) of the internet &#8230; but it&#8217;s a very complex dynamic. Like you, Miriam, I&#8217;m inclined to see arguments that your presence at Feministing = tokenism as reductive and ultimately judgmental of your participation in a space you&#8217;ve chosen without stopping to listen to how you experience that participation, and what it means to you in terms of your blogging, your activism, your identity, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy 3rd Birthday Radical Doula: Fun facts &#171; Radical Doula</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Happy 3rd Birthday Radical Doula: Fun facts &#171; Radical Doula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-7306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February 19: Some thoughts on tokenism [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 19: Some thoughts on tokenism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsername</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whatsername]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual I love your thoughts and words RD. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual I love your thoughts and words RD. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: root</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[root]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have tried, of late, to be honest at every moment. Besides being an insanely difficult practice, it has opened and closed doors I could not have imagined. I mention this, merely to say that the fear of tokenism, both in yourself and white/privileged people near you, would start to dissipate under those circumstances. Mind you, it doesn&#039;t work so well when the white/privileged people around you don&#039;t wish to engage in honest discussions - you will loose and gain friends, you couldn&#039;t imagine. The good news is you will address those questions within yourself and allow your behaviors in these complex situations to evolve. I&#039;m lighter these days, and that&#039;s enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried, of late, to be honest at every moment. Besides being an insanely difficult practice, it has opened and closed doors I could not have imagined. I mention this, merely to say that the fear of tokenism, both in yourself and white/privileged people near you, would start to dissipate under those circumstances. Mind you, it doesn&#8217;t work so well when the white/privileged people around you don&#8217;t wish to engage in honest discussions &#8211; you will loose and gain friends, you couldn&#8217;t imagine. The good news is you will address those questions within yourself and allow your behaviors in these complex situations to evolve. I&#8217;m lighter these days, and that&#8217;s enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminist Review</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feminist Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;two outsiders in the feminist blog world&quot;

I guess that could be construed as true... if you consider being an active feminist blogger, including writing for a blog that you write for, for over two years an &quot;outsider&quot;. But nice (failed) attempt at invalidation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;two outsiders in the feminist blog world&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess that could be construed as true&#8230; if you consider being an active feminist blogger, including writing for a blog that you write for, for over two years an &#8220;outsider&#8221;. But nice (failed) attempt at invalidation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iris</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for responding - i appreciate your respectful tone and i agree with much of your observations (overly reflective indeed!!)....and the overwhelming sense of frustration is contagious to say the least!
again, i appreciate your response and your thoughtfulness....i&#039;m new here and will most certainly return 
~ iris]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for responding &#8211; i appreciate your respectful tone and i agree with much of your observations (overly reflective indeed!!)&#8230;.and the overwhelming sense of frustration is contagious to say the least!<br />
again, i appreciate your response and your thoughtfulness&#8230;.i&#8217;m new here and will most certainly return<br />
~ iris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radicaldoula</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radicaldoula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your thoughts and reflection Iris. 

I have to admit that after reading van deven/shoot&#039;s apology, I was more frustrated than anything else. It didn&#039;t want me to continue to engage in the debate they started. I felt it was defensive, overly reflective and just not that helpful. It doesn&#039;t fundamentally change the tone of their original post or make me less angered or frustrated. 

I don&#039;t really want to engage further in a discussion started by them, two outsiders in the feminist blog world, that was based on so many assumptions (many that were false) and was frankly super patronizing. I don&#039;t want to dialogue on their terms, or in response to their thoughts. Frankly the whole thing appeared to me as an attempt to enter with a splash into the feminist blog world. I didn&#039;t want to feed into that controversy anymore than I already had. 

They posted their &quot;apology&quot; on a blog called digitalcolonialism. That in and of itself is enough for me to feel over it and uninterested in engaging more with them. Neither really responded to my concerns except to say &quot;sorry we didn&#039;t try to make friends with you first!&quot; I&#039;m sorry but that&#039;s bs. 

These conversations are important. The way the blogosphere is constructed, how certain voices rise to more prominence than others, all of those things need to be talked about. But it&#039;s important to me that this conversation start from a place of respect, of mutual understanding, from people who don&#039;t presume to know how it functions without actually asking. 

The initial &quot;response&quot; that Mandy posted here was the exact same comment she posted on Sharkfu&#039;s blog. Word for word. That&#039;s not the kind of dialogue I&#039;m interested in having.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts and reflection Iris. </p>
<p>I have to admit that after reading van deven/shoot&#8217;s apology, I was more frustrated than anything else. It didn&#8217;t want me to continue to engage in the debate they started. I felt it was defensive, overly reflective and just not that helpful. It doesn&#8217;t fundamentally change the tone of their original post or make me less angered or frustrated. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really want to engage further in a discussion started by them, two outsiders in the feminist blog world, that was based on so many assumptions (many that were false) and was frankly super patronizing. I don&#8217;t want to dialogue on their terms, or in response to their thoughts. Frankly the whole thing appeared to me as an attempt to enter with a splash into the feminist blog world. I didn&#8217;t want to feed into that controversy anymore than I already had. </p>
<p>They posted their &#8220;apology&#8221; on a blog called digitalcolonialism. That in and of itself is enough for me to feel over it and uninterested in engaging more with them. Neither really responded to my concerns except to say &#8220;sorry we didn&#8217;t try to make friends with you first!&#8221; I&#8217;m sorry but that&#8217;s bs. </p>
<p>These conversations are important. The way the blogosphere is constructed, how certain voices rise to more prominence than others, all of those things need to be talked about. But it&#8217;s important to me that this conversation start from a place of respect, of mutual understanding, from people who don&#8217;t presume to know how it functions without actually asking. </p>
<p>The initial &#8220;response&#8221; that Mandy posted here was the exact same comment she posted on Sharkfu&#8217;s blog. Word for word. That&#8217;s not the kind of dialogue I&#8217;m interested in having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iris</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have been reading as much as i can w/regard to this discussion....i&#039;d like to refrain from including all of my thoughts and instead highlight one aspect of your discussion, RD. what stands out to me is your recognition that despite your choice to write for the &#039;big time&#039; blog, the fact that you were asked to do so, &quot;...offered an opportunity, a larger microphone, a new platform&quot;, is quite telling. i feel as if my comment is less relevant to the specific case at hand as to the greater question of &quot;choice&quot;, but i felt your emphasis was a revealing and seemingly neglected facet of this ongoing, and quite frankly, disheartening, blogospheric saga. 
by highlighting the fact that you were offered an opportunity seems to make van deven/shoot&#039;s point, no? 
i&#039;d like to add that feministing and those associated with it have seemed to let the dialogue peeter out following the apology issued by van deven/shoot instead of recognizing it as a means to continue this important discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been reading as much as i can w/regard to this discussion&#8230;.i&#8217;d like to refrain from including all of my thoughts and instead highlight one aspect of your discussion, RD. what stands out to me is your recognition that despite your choice to write for the &#8216;big time&#8217; blog, the fact that you were asked to do so, &#8220;&#8230;offered an opportunity, a larger microphone, a new platform&#8221;, is quite telling. i feel as if my comment is less relevant to the specific case at hand as to the greater question of &#8220;choice&#8221;, but i felt your emphasis was a revealing and seemingly neglected facet of this ongoing, and quite frankly, disheartening, blogospheric saga.<br />
by highlighting the fact that you were offered an opportunity seems to make van deven/shoot&#8217;s point, no?<br />
i&#8217;d like to add that feministing and those associated with it have seemed to let the dialogue peeter out following the apology issued by van deven/shoot instead of recognizing it as a means to continue this important discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittany and Mandy</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brittany and Mandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://digitalcolonialism.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;An Apology from Brittany and Mandy&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digitalcolonialism.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">An Apology from Brittany and Mandy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What if the feminist blogosphere is a form of digital colonialism? &#171; Professor, What If&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://radicaldoula.com/2009/02/19/some-thoughts-on-tokenism/#comment-5834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What if the feminist blogosphere is a form of digital colonialism? &#171; Professor, What If&#8230;?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radicaldoula.com/?p=337#comment-5834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February 19, 2009 at 10:06 am Some thoughts on tokenism &#171; Radical Doula [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 19, 2009 at 10:06 am Some thoughts on tokenism &laquo; Radical Doula [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

