Work for an awesome org–National Advocates for Pregnant Women

February 28, 2008

I’ve talked about the National Advocates for Pregnant Women quite a bit, as their conference was a big part of the synergy that led me to create this blog. Well they are hiring folks! So if you want the opportunity to work for a great organization that does legal advocacy on behalf of pregnant women–check out the listings.


Good news for Missouri Midwives!

February 21, 2008

News from Missouri Midwives Supporters
CONTACT:  Mary Ueland (417) 543-4258, better_birth@yahoo.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  Wednesday, February 20, 2008
 
Midwives Licensure Bill Passes Missouri Senate Committee
Comprehensive bill will decriminalize practice of midwifery, and license and regulate midwives
 
(Jefferson City, Mo.) – Midwives advocates across Missouri and the nation today celebrated the passage of Senator John Loudon’s (R, Chesterfield) midwifery licensure bill, SB 1021, from the Missouri Senate Committee on Pensions, General Laws and Veteran’s Affairs.  The long-anticipated legislation would decriminalize the practice of midwifery in Missouri and establish a board to license and regulate Certified Professional Midwives (CPMs).

The committee voted 5-1 before a hearing room packed with citizens from across the state, many of whom represented families who wish to choose a legal midwife to assist them during childbirth.  Committee members combined the bill with SB870, a repeal of the midwifery provision in current statute.  The resulting committee substitute is a comprehensive piece of midwifery legislation.  

“Missouri needs legal midwives,” said Debbie Smithey, President of Missouri Midwives Association.  “This bill will license and regulate the midwives whose legal status is currently in question before the Supreme Court.”
Currently, Certified Nurse-Midwives, who work predominantly in hospital settings, are licensed and regulated in all 50 states, while Certified Professional Midwives, who work in out-of-hospital settings, are licensed and regulated in 24 states, with legislation pending in an additional 20 states, Missouri among them. 

CPMs’ training as specialists in out-of-hospital maternity care qualifies them as essential providers during disasters in which hospitals become inaccessible or unsafe for laboring mothers and newborn babies. In addition, this bill will ensure that all babies born outside of the hospital undergo state-mandated newborn screenings and are provided with legal and secure birth certificates.

“We applaud the committee for their clear show of support for health care freedom in childbirth,” said Laurel Smith, President of Friends of Missouri Midwives, a statewide network of thousands of Missouri homebirth families,  “The parents of our state have been deprived of the freedom to choose a legal midwife specifically trained in out-of-hospital maternity care for too long.  We look forward to seeing this issue debated in the full Senate and anticipate the day when professional midwives are legally recognized and able to serve women freely.”

Missouri is part of The Big Push for Midwives Campaign
Media inquiries should be directed to Mary Ueland at (417) 543-4258, better_birth@yahoo.com.
#####
For more info:
Friends of Missouri Midwives
Missouri Midwives Association
Show-Me Freedom in Healthcare
Free the Midwives
The Big Push for Midwives Campaign

Thanks to Steff for the info.


Mile-High doulas

February 20, 2008

I was on a Frontier Airlines flight to Denver yesterday, and out of boredom I started flipping through the onboard magazine, GO Wild. To my great surprise there was a short piece under their “Thrive!” section entitled: Resolve Isn’t A Swear Word: These remedies are just what the doctor, the doula and the debutante ordered. Are doulas reaching the mainstream? The remedy they mention in the piece is Erbaviva’s Organic Quease-Ease Lip Balm, something originally created to help women with morning sickness. Not so doula relevant. So maybe they just picked doula cause it went with the alliteration, but still! The more visibility the better, I’d say.


Adoption Dialogues

February 16, 2008

Last week I attended the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force’s Annual Conference, Creating Change. It was a really interesting week, with tons of panels and workshops on a wide range of issues. I was a little bit disappointed to see the lack of workshops on the topic of family creation.I would think that for the LGBT community how we create our families (and what related rights we have) would be of the utmost importance. Part of this absence may have been a backlash to the many marriage-only conversations that occur in gay activism as well. But there are a wide range of topics that I think could be important to the LGBT community around family creation. For example, surrogacy, adoption, do-it-yourself inseminations and coparenting with non-romantic partners.

I did attend one workshop that focused on the issue of intercountry adoption, and I wanted to share some of the issues brought up in that workshop with all of you. Pauline Park facilitated the workshop, a woman who is herself a korean transnational adoptee.

The topic brought up some interesting discussion. I learned that the history of intercountry adoption began after the Korean War, when Christian missionaries set up shop in Korea and facilitated the adoption of Korean children by white Christian parents from the US. This process had its roots in the ideology of salvation, that these families were saving the Korean children (as well as showing them the way of Christ). Since those days the international adoption market (as some people would call it) has exploded, and children are adopted from a wide array of countries, including most popularly China, Guatemala and Russia.

Some questions posed by this issue:

–What kind of regulations should be put in place to regulate this market? Is it the responsibility of the adoptive parents country or the childrens?

–Is it okay for this to be (in some cases) a for-profit industry? If so, who should be making the money? The birth parents or the adoption agencies?

–What about the cultural competence of the parents? How can we ensure that the (mostly white) parents will be able to raise the child in a way that recognizes their background?

–What about race?

–What about the rights of the birth parents? Are the women giving up their children in these developing countries really given a choice? Or are the economic circumstances overly influencing that choice?

–What about abortion? For many anti-choice people, adoption is seen as the perfect alternative to abortion. Is it really?

–And finally, what about the desires of some people to become parents, in many cases without the “biological option”?

I unfortunately don’t have the answers to any of these questions, but here is a great piece by Elizabeth Larson in Mother Jones which grapples with some of these important issues from a personal perspective. It’s called Did I Steal My Daughter? The Tribulations of Global Adoption.


An inspiring birth story to start off your day

February 12, 2008

This birth story was sent to a doula listserve I am on, and its a definite must-read. In it a woman shares her battle to have the childbirth she wanted even after premature rupture of membranes, 4 weeks of bed rest in a hospital and countless attempts at intervention.

I have to admit I got a little teary-eyed toward the end.

She is my lesson in surrender. She is an exercise in determination and grace. She showed Mark and I how to work together again in ways that were instinctually natural. To come together in ways that we have not been, in entirely too long. A friend said it was magick the way that by surrendering some things, standing firm on others and in facing one of my absolute worst fears and turning myself over to it, we were given the gift of a perfect birth.


Natural Birth only hospital unit in UK

February 6, 2008

From the BBC, information about a hospital unit run by midwives that promotes “natural birth.”

It is run by midwives with doctors, allowed in only by invitation, and if a problem occurs mothers are moved. The ethos on the ward is that the birth process must be allowed to take its natural course, although pain relief drugs are given. Midwife Doreen Brunton, who is part of the team which runs the unit, told the BBC Scotland news website: “If you intervene too soon, labours get augmented, they end up with problems with the babies, sections or forceps.

What I like best about it is the emphasis on non-intervention, which is so important as a reaction to the highly interventionist obstretrical environment. We need something like this in the US. The other piece of good news is that the number of women using this unit has doubled in the last year. I wonder if they have doulas in this unit? But once again, we see natural birth being equated with epidural usage. Sigh. I’m not against epidurals, but they definitely have affects on the labor that need to be taken into consideration.

Also, the Royal College of Midwives (also in the UK) has a great campaign called the Campaign for Normal Birth.

Together, we can change the way childbirth happens. The Campaign aims to inspire and support normal birth practice. It’s a reminder that good birth experiences can happen despite the challenges. Intervention and caesarean shouldn’t be the first choice – they should be the last.

Wanna move to the UK anyone?


A New Campaign for Midwives

February 3, 2008

On January 24, 2008–”Push day” a new campaign to promote midwives, The Big Push for Midwives, was launched. It’s a campaign coordinated by a group of Certified Professional Midwives (CPMs) to promote the midwifery model of care.

Our goals are to fully integrate the Midwives Model of Care into the health care systems of our states, to highlight the importance of family healthcare choices and to defend the ability of CPMs to provide legal and safe prenatal, birth and postpartum care to families in every state.

Sounds good to me. There is a great map which explains what states allow the licensing of CPMs and which do not. I also appreciate coordinated advocacy campaigns, where different groups can learn from each others mistakes and accomplishments. It’s also really good timing–The Business of Being Born is getting a lot of attention and bringing new people to this issue and the crisis in maternity care continues to escalate.

CPMs differ from CNMs (certified nurse midwives) in that they aren’t registered nurses and don’t go through the same type of schooling and training. The laws and types of certification vary, but we’re not talking about little old ladies with no training at all. CPMs learn midwifery techniques through apprenticeship, coursework and lots of experience. They are also frequently required to pass certification exams.

I think this type of midwifery is important because I have fundamental problems with the modern medical education, particularly when it comes to birth. Even CNMs have to start their education as nurses, who learn the scientific model of birth that has created the maternity crisis we’re in today. They practice in hospitals and are forced to follow hospital regulations which are bad for birth,. Some of the reasons I have yet to become a midwife stem from this–I’m afraid to begin my education with the modern medical logic. But being a CPM, or a lay midwife, is difficult because of varying state regulations that determine where and how you can practice. That’s what this campaign is trying to change.

Great interview with a midwife from the campaign website.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 699 other followers